Art: Michael Hussar

This dude creeps me out. His work is very clowny. This really touches the bad side of my psyche, Clowns freak me out. But I can tell this guy is going for the freak out marketing dollar. So it works. I’m sold. This stuff is kind of erotic as well. well, at least the girl sucking on the sucker one any way. Any way, This is who I am featuring this week. Be sure to check out his web site! Very talented artist.
My Favorites:
Flown.
Nazi.
White Devil.
Buffoon.
Check out his Myspace page HERE!
Share ThisCategory: 17-Art |












April 8th, 2008 at 4:54 am
Great artist … Recall many paintings in my opinion a kind of revenge following the loss of ‘innocence.
April 8th, 2008 at 10:31 am
Amazing stuff. Thanks for sharing this. Aside form the unique style, it’s great to see the use of oils on wood as the medium. Very talanted!
April 9th, 2008 at 11:48 am
wow what kind of art.. it’s kind of nuttiness and spectacular, very interesting
the last work of ‘godsend’ ‘E.o.E.’ remembered me somehow on my childhood
April 9th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
i love this artist!
ive like his stuff for a while and think its fucking awesome you posted about him.
April 15th, 2008 at 7:05 pm
One of the best exhibitions I ever saw was of works from the Prinzhorn Collection. I think it was called “Beyond Psychoses: the Art of the Insane” or something like that. It was at the Heywood Gallery in London about 10 years ago. All the works shared two unusual characteristics: they were all done by inmates/patients of various European mental institutions and they were all made without any regard for commercial gain or public exhibition, entirely born of the inner urgings of the artists. Looking at the work of Mr Hussar has put in mind of that exhibition although, by no means, were all the works exhibited there of comparable subject matter or technical expertise. However, I find that I do not have the same frisson, looking at Mr Hussar’s pictures (good as they are) as I felt at that exhibition and I think the reason is this: whereas one set of works has been consciously made to shock or to make the viewer uncomfortable, the other set has not -but yet some of them did shock (and profundly so). If that makes any sense…….